What Elizabeth Taylor Can Teach Us About Simplicity

photo credit: independentman
Elizabeth Taylor can be called many things, but simple is not one of them. However, in her book My Love Affair with Jewelry, La Liz lays down some profound insight on the philosophy of simplicity.
I don’t believe I own any of the pieces [of jewelry]. I believe that I am their custodian, here to enjoy them, to give them the best treatment in the world, to watch over their safety, and to love them.
While most of us aren’t dealing with tennis-ball sized diamonds, her idea of custodianship is powerful. Let’s unpack this a bit. According to this idea, the value of an object (outside of investments and assets) isn’t in the ownership. The value of an object lies in your enjoyment, use, and appreciation of it.
You don’t have to own an item to enjoy it and get full use out of it. In fact, ownership itself is a big, fat goose egg—a nothing, in essence. Don’t pin your hopes for happiness on owning any item, since the real pleasure comes from use and appreciation.
Of course, the idea isn’t to borrow or rent everything in your life. The idea, in my understanding, is not to value an item simply because we own it. An item is precious for what it is, and the best we can hope for is add one more layer of meaning to it in our custodial tenure.
The Full Circle of Fabulousness
This philosophy is fabulously full circle. If we embrace the idea of custodianship, we begin to search for items with a past. This may mean hitting thrift stores, antique stores, yard sales, and your mother’s junk jewelry drawer. We appreciate the history of the item, but we don’t let it hold us back.
Then, we bring our own history to it. This means that instead of leaving that special item in a drawer, you can pull it out and use it, wear it, or admire it. Add happy memories to it and give it a place in today’s world.
Finally, when it’s time to move on or pass on, find a new custodian of the item who will treasure it as you did. Consider it recycling, regifting, rediscovering… Call it by whatever name you want, the end result is a more meaningful experience than mere ownership can provide.

photo credit: -Merce-
Benefits of the Elizabeth Taylor Philosophy of Beautiful Things
-
It’s more eco-friendly. If we choose objects with their lifetimes in mind instead of ours, we can make choices that are more lasting and less wasteful. Choosing items that have a history or that can be passed on discourages disposable consumerism.
-
We have a reason to care for our objects more carefully. Can you imagine Ms. Taylor being nonchalant with the centuries-old Taj Mahal diamond? If we feel that we are simply the custodians of items, then we have an obligation to take care of them to the best of our abilities. They aren’t ours, they belong to the world and to history. By taking care of them, we get more enjoyment out of them, and they’re ready to provide the same enjoyment to the next generation.
-
We build a sense of history and community. Imagine how much more connected we might feel if more of the everyday items we touched had a colorful past. It’s the difference between wearing your great-grandfather’s wedding cufflinks and the ones from the department store counter. They just feel better.
It’s not applicable to everything, but I find this idea very intriguing. Do you think the former Helena Cassadine has a point? Is it still just materialism? Dive into the comments and let me know what your take is.






This post has 16 comments
July 1st, 2008
It’s difficult for me to accept anything that she said as sound… she is to me a symbol of shallowness and materialism. But I do agree that you don’t have to own something in order to enjoy it.
July 1st, 2008
Vered,
I can see where you’re coming from. She’s not exactly shy about the bling, after all!
There are a lot of things I enjoy about Elizabeth Taylor, though: she’s an eternal optimist, is fantastically talented, has survived quite a few things that might level other people, and is very candid about her life.
July 1st, 2008
You’re right. We don’t need to own or borrow everything that we admire. We can be happy for our neighbor who has that awesome car. Just because it’s out there doesn’t mean that we need to have it.
July 1st, 2008
Karl,
That’s a great addition to the idea: not needing to “own” something means not needing to envy other people’s stuff.
July 1st, 2008
Wow, I never thought I’d see “Elizabeth Taylor” and “eco-friendly” in the same blog post! Point well taken however.
Nice picture of Liz also.
July 1st, 2008
Elizabeth Taylor and simplicity - things you normally don’t see in the same sentence! However, the idea of custodianship is powerful. It’s a good way to look at many of the “things” we have. I need to be better at this, and value the things that I have more. It will make me think more before buying some things - will I really value it, or am I just purchasing on a whim? My mother is good at custodianship. She is now looking to downsize a bit, and is always interested in giving away what she has to family - but only if it is something they want and will appreciate for it’s sentimental value (i.e. a table made by her father). The older I get, the more I appreciate this outlook.
July 1st, 2008
I definitely see Elizabeth Taylor in a different light. Very nice post.
July 1st, 2008
I loved Elizabeth Taylor in “National Velvet”. What Liz says about jewels is what the environmentalists say about the earth, we’re custodians of planet earth and have to keep it in good shape for the next generation.
July 1st, 2008
I love to shopt at second hand stores does this qualify as Elizabeth Tayloresque?
July 1st, 2008
@Amanda: Thanks for not taking me to task for including those two concepts together!
@Lance: I think your mother’s approach is awesome. That’s the way I’d like to do things eventually.
@Mark: Thanks! Nice to know that the guys are still reading this one!
@Marelisa: Exactly! Even though Ms. Taylor is talking about ridiculously expensive jewelry, the idea can be so much more expansive.
@Chris: Are you purchasing diamond tiaras at these secondhand stores? That would definitely be Liz-like.
July 1st, 2008
Excellent post. I was just thinking earlier today how much more I appreciate the old things I have because of their history and really wouldn’t be happy having everything new.
Unless they’re bought with a view to making a profit, I don’t see how owning vintage paraphanalia can be seen as capitalist so my answer is no, it isn’t.
July 1st, 2008
Sorry… that should have been “being the custodian of vintage paraphanalia”. Just goes to show how our minds have been programmed to ‘own’, doesn’t it?
July 2nd, 2008
Hi Sara,
You do bring up an excellent point. It reminds me of when people are faced with having to evacuate their homes (due to unforeseen circumstances). They all say they grabbed things that had meaning, history and relevance. You never hear anyone saying “I grabbed my flat screen TV”.
July 2nd, 2008
@Sharon: Thanks for adding your opinion! I agree that vintage items can create a great balance as opposed to all new.
@Barbara: Perfect example of this philosophy at work!
July 18th, 2008
you know, walter benjamin has an essay about the pleasures of collecting in which he esoupses a similar view of the relationship of the book collector to his books: his ownership is a moment in the book’s trajectory- the object-relation is one of mutual enjoyment and fulfilment. by owning- and caring - for the book, the collector preserves it for future generations and adds to its value by having esteemed it as an object. while some might think that this verges on fetishism, looking at “things” in a less permanently possessive way is an excellent way to simplify one’s life. so, i think the surprise isn’t , who knew liz taylor could be less materialistic, but , isn’t it interesting that liz taylor shares a viewpoint with a famous marxist scholar? great blog.
July 20th, 2008
Hi Stephanie,
You’re right–I certainly never pinned La Liz and Marxism as being part of the same continuum. I definitely enjoy the idea that we can value objects as objects and not extensions of ourselves or personalities. Thanks so much for adding to the conversation!
Trackbacks
Add a comment